IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/social/v3y2023i1id18377.html

Writing Memos: A Vital Classic Grounded Theory Task

Author

Listed:
  • Barry Chametzky

    (American College of Education, United States)

Abstract

The process of writing and sorting memos is an important and indeed vital component of doing a classic grounded theory study. Writing memos allows a researcher to move from description to richer, more mature memos ultimately ending with a sophisticated, rich, conceptual, multivariate theory. Memos are compared one with another through a method called constant comparison. Any heretofore unknown connections are established during the comparison and sorting process. These connections develop and become increasingly conceptual during the entire memoing process. Through the entire mandatory process of writing and sorting memos that have been presented in many works of Glaser, the problem is that it is still misunderstood by novice researchers who have not experienced such a process and who are more accustomed to various analytic procedures common in qualitative data analysis. In this methodological paper, I will take the reader broadly through the memo process to present and further elucidate this important and sometimes confusing tenet of classic grounded theory. The purpose of this methodological paper is to provide explanations regarding the memo process in classic grounded theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry Chametzky, 2023. "Writing Memos: A Vital Classic Grounded Theory Task," European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 3(1), pages 39-43, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:18377
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/view/18377
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/download/18377/4526
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsocial.2023.3.1.377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:3:y:2023:i:1:id:18377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.