IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/social/v2y2022i6id18333.html

Evaluating the ‘Whys’ of Noncompliance with COVID- 19 Safety Measures in Lecture Halls/Theatres by Nigerian Undergraduates: The Perspectives of Students of Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Nneka Nwikpo
  • Azukaego Ifeoma Eluemuno
  • Israel Ugoma Obedjemurho
  • Thompson Adagba Onah

Abstract

Following the relaxation of lockdown necessitated by the outbreak of COVID-19, schools reopened and the need to contain the spread in schools became pivotal; making authorities of schools, including Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NAU), Awka, set up a response committee which came up with clearly spelled-out control measures for both staff and students. However, it is one thing to come up with a well-meaning policy and another and more importantly, to enforce unflinching compliance with the policy. It was the researchers’ observation that this safety policy did not enjoy unalloyed compliance and therefore, they considered it necessary to find out the whys of this noncompliance to put the school management and government at a vantage point to handle any eventual new waves of the pandemic. This study, therefore, sought to investigate the factors which militated against total compliance with COVID-19 pandemic safety measures in Nigerian schools and specifically the universities, from the perspectives of students of NAU, Awka. The present study adopted the descriptive survey design to examine the factors. The sample size was 786 (352 females and 434 males) ages16 – 20 years who were randomly selected through a multistage sampling technique. The researcher-developed questionnaire titled Students’ Responses to COVID-19 Safety Measures Questionnaire (RCSMQ) was used to obtain the data for the study during their first semester examinations. The instrument was duly validated by two experts from the departments of Educational Foundations and Education Management and Policy, NAU, Awka respectively. The reliability of the instrument was determined using Cronbach alpha and an alpha coefficient of 0.82 was obtained which was high enough and therefore deemed reliable. Three research questions guided the study. They were answered using frequency and percentages and means. Results indicated that the interaction of factors such as school, lecturers and students-related hindered compliance of staff and students to the COVID-19 safety measures guiding the university. Factors found to have impeded compliance included a lack of enough lecture halls while the available ones were not spacious enough to allow for physical distancing, students’ delusion of the non-existence of the pandemic, and lack of interest from both lecturers and students, among others. The researchers concluded that there is a lot that lay on the hands of every stakeholder in the education system to keep our Nigerian schools safe from the menace of an eventual new wave of COVID-19 virus or outbreak of other tragic and challenging health problems that may occur in future, especially those that spread faster in overcrowded settings like school settings, and therefore, recommend that the government should increase budgetary allocation that can adequately fund university education needs while the school management should judiciously manage the funds to construct enough spacious lecture halls and provide other facilities, organize necessary programs for lecturers to orient them on the management of students in health challenging situations like that of COVID-19. Programs organized to eliminate the doubts of doubting Thomases among the students against the reality of COVID-19 and other health problems and their illusion of invulnerability are also recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Nneka Nwikpo & Azukaego Ifeoma Eluemuno & Israel Ugoma Obedjemurho & Thompson Adagba Onah, 2022. "Evaluating the ‘Whys’ of Noncompliance with COVID- 19 Safety Measures in Lecture Halls/Theatres by Nigerian Undergraduates: The Perspectives of Students of Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka," European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:2:y:2022:i:6:id:18333
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.6.333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/view/18333
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/download/18333/4516
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.6.333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay J. Van Bavel & Katherine Baicker & Paulo S. Boggio & Valerio Capraro & Aleksandra Cichocka & Mina Cikara & Molly J. Crockett & Alia J. Crum & Karen M. Douglas & James N. Druckman & John Drury & Oe, 2020. "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 460-471, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wanja Wolff & Corinna S. Martarelli & Julia Schüler & Maik Bieleke, 2020. "High Boredom Proneness and Low Trait Self-Control Impair Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Rabia Bokhari & Khurram Shahzad, 2022. "Explaining Resistance to the COVID-19 Preventive Measures: A Psychological Reactance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Vivek Shastry & D Cale Reeves & Nicholas Willems & Varun Rai, 2022. "Policy and behavioral response to shock events: An agent-based model of the effectiveness and equity of policy design features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Chao Gu & Yi Feng, 2025. "The Influence of Public Engagement with Science on Trust in Science During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Testing a Mediation Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    5. Sonika Redhu & Pragati Jain, 2024. "Unveiling the nexus between water scarcity and socioeconomic development in the water-scarce countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19557-19577, August.
    6. Chunhao Wei & Han Chen & Yee Ming Lee, 2022. "COVID-19 preventive measures and restaurant customers’ intention to dine out: the role of brand trust and perceived risk," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 581-600, September.
    7. Yiting Guo & Jason Shachat & Matthew J. Walker & Lijia Wei, 2021. "Viral social media videos can raise pro-social behaviours when an epidemic arises," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 120-138, December.
    8. Marijn H. C. Meijers & Christin Scholz & Ragnheiður “Heather” Torfadóttir & Anke Wonneberger & Marko Markov, 2022. "Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic to combat climate change: comparing drivers of individual action in global crises," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 272-282, June.
    9. Tobias Schlager & Ashley V. Whillans, 2022. "People underestimate the probability of contracting the coronavirus from friends," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Mukesh Kumar Swami & Tanu Gupta, 2021. "Psychological impact of fear-based messages in context of COVID 19," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(8), pages 1081-1082, December.
    11. Laliotis, Ioannis & Minos, Dimitrios, 2022. "Religion, social interactions, and COVID-19 incidence in Western Germany," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Juvalta, Sibylle & Speranza, Camilla & Robin, Dominik & El Maohub, Yassmeen & Krasselt, Julia & Dreesen, Philipp & Dratva, Julia & Suggs, L. Suzanne, 2023. "Young people's media use and adherence to preventive measures in the “infodemic”: Is it masked by political ideology?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    13. Younes, George Abi & Ayoubi, Charles & Ballester, Omar & Cristelli, Gabriele & de Rassenfosse, Gaetan & Foray, Dominique & Gaule, Patrick & Pellegrino, Gabriele & van den Heuvel, Matthias & Webster, B, 2020. "COVID-19_Insights from Innovation Economists," SocArXiv b5zae, Center for Open Science.
      • Dominique Foray & Gaetan de Rassenfosse & George Abi Younes & Charles Ayoubi & Omar Ballester & Gabriele Cristelli & Matthias van den Heuvel & Ling Zhou & Gabriele Pellegrino & Patrick Gaulé & Elizab, 2020. "COVID-19: Insights from Innovation Economists," Working Papers 10, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
    14. Hubert, Philipp & Abdel Hadi, Sascha & Mojzisch, Andreas & Häusser, Jan Alexander, 2022. "The effects of organizational climate on adherence to guidelines for COVID-19 prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    15. Hamza Umer, 2023. "Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 255-287, February.
    16. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tam-Tri Le & Viet-Phuong La & Huyen Thanh Thanh Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Quy Khuc & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2022. "Covid-19 vaccines production and societal immunization under the serendipity-mindsponge-3D knowledge management theory and conceptual framework," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Pierre Genest & Léo Trespeuch, 2022. "Internet users’ perception about the impact of the pandemic on sports sponsorship [La perception des internautes face à l'impact de la pandémie sur le mécénat sportif]," Working Papers hal-03945701, HAL.
    18. Xin Sun & Wei Song & Ye Wei, 2026. "Adapting mobility: insights from COVID-19 impact on east asian regions," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Neranjan Senarath & Wathsala Dedunupitiya & Gayanthi Ilangarathna & Isuru Thilakasiri & Bhagya Samarakoon & Lakshitha Ramanayake & Roshan Godaliyadda & Parakrama Ekanayake & Vijitha Herath & Mallika P, 2024. "Family income does not necessarily lead to a holistic e-learning experience during COVID-19: a study in Sri Lanka," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Bahety, Girija & Bauhoff, Sebastian & Patel, Dev & Potter, James, 2021. "Texts don’t nudge: An adaptive trial to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:2:y:2022:i:6:id:18333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.