Author
Listed:
- Beryl N. Olubandwa
(Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain)
- Masoud Zamani
(Shiraz University, Iran)
Abstract
COVID-19 disrupted trade worldwide, causing supply and demand chain disruptions. As a result, trade volume dropped dramatically in the first half of 2020, forcing countries to implement new policies to defend their economies. The study revealed new Non-tariff barriers caused by COVID-19 into the East African region that prevented cooperation and effective negotiations. Without this consensus, the trade will not be able to flow freely. Trade negotiations aim to achieve the mutual reduction of barriers to trade among countries to lead to improved access to markets and stimulate economic growth. The study used inductive reasoning and an empiricist approach using a constructivist ontology to explain challenges informing multilateral trade policies during the Covid-19 crisis in Africa. The research adopted Chatham house rules to encourage participation and discussion. The study examined the challenges faced by policymakers in implementing old and new policies during the COVID-19 period and evaluated the East African countries' capacity to adopt multilateral trade policies, multilateral trade agreements, and multilateral cooperation within regional trade agreements, despite East Africa mechanisms, including the East African Community Elimination of Non-Tariff Barriers Act, 2017. NTB elimination mechanisms have proven ineffective, owing primarily to member country's political and nationalistic policies. NTBs can be effectively eliminated through legally binding systems, such as the COMESA taxing protocol, but all these measures are dependent on member states' cooperation. NTBs are complex and recurring in nature; there is a need for further research into the implementation and complexities of NTBs.
Suggested Citation
Beryl N. Olubandwa & Masoud Zamani, 2022.
"Non-Tariff Barriers Challenge on Formation of Multilateral Trade Policy during the Covid-19 Crisis in the East African Trade Region,"
European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(2), pages 63-70, March.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:social:v:2:y:2022:i:2:id:18238
DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2022.2.2.238
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:2:y:2022:i:2:id:18238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.