IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/social/v1y2021i6id18126.html

Family Planning as A Determining Factor in Preference to Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) Among Somali Community in Dadaab Refugee Camps, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Newton Kahumbi Maina

    (Kenyatta University, Kenya)

  • Josephine Gitome

    (Kenyatta University, Kenya)

  • Jennifer Bagelman

    (New Castle University, United Kingdom)

  • Muthoni Mainah

    (Kenyatta University, Kenya)

  • Jacqueline M. Kituku

    (Kenyatta University, Kenya)

  • Teresa Mwoma

    (Kenyatta University, Kenya)

  • Priscilla Ndegwa

    (Kenyatta University, Kenya)

Abstract

Statement of Problem: Family planning is a determining factor in the maternal health care choices for Somali pregnant mothers in Dadaab Refugee camps. Research has revealed that during delivery, the Somali mothers prefer the services of Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) to those of midwives in hospitals. The preference for TBAs is borne of the belief that when women deliver in hospitals, they could be subjected to family planning against their will. The contention is that Islam and socio-cultural practices of the Somali community do not advocate family planning. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Islam’s position on family planning in order to explain the response of the Somalis of Dadaab refugee camps on family planning. Methodology & Theoretical orientation: The paper is derived from a qualitative study that involved snowball sampling, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). These methods brought out family planning as a determining factor in the mother’s choice of TBAs as opposed to hospital midwives in Dadaab Refugee camps. Findings: Any discourse on Islam and family planning offers two perspectives: proponents of family planning and opponents of family planning. Both perspectives use the texts of the Qur’an and Hadith (traditions) and different interpretations to justify and support their respective positions and opinions. Through primary and secondary sources, the paper interrogates both perspectives of family planning in Islam. Conclusion & Significance: It is concluded that the Somalis’ belief on family planning is informed by the two perspectives of family planning, but the opponents’ perspective holds sway. This determines the preference for TBAs for fear that mothers who deliver in hospitals could be subjected to family planning contraceptives. Recommendation: there is need to educate the community further on Islamic teachings on family planning; and more sensitization conducted on the benefits of child spacing.

Suggested Citation

  • Newton Kahumbi Maina & Josephine Gitome & Jennifer Bagelman & Muthoni Mainah & Jacqueline M. Kituku & Teresa Mwoma & Priscilla Ndegwa, 2021. "Family Planning as A Determining Factor in Preference to Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) Among Somali Community in Dadaab Refugee Camps, Kenya," European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 1(6), pages 1-5, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:1:y:2021:i:6:id:18126
    DOI: 10.24018/ejsocial.2021.1.6.126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/view/18126
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial/article/download/18126/4435
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejsocial.2021.1.6.126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:social:v:1:y:2021:i:6:id:18126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejsocial .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.