Author
Abstract
Recent worldwide innovations and technology breakthroughs, especially in Indonesia, profoundly influence societal dynamics. This inherently drives the government to innovate and adapt, especially in legislative areas that align with contemporary advancements. The challenge of establishing land ownership rights in Indonesia is one such issue. Counterfeit certificates, duplicate documents, conflicting evidence of land ownership rights, and various offences in the agricultural sector remain prevalent, resulting in disputes over land ownership rights that are profoundly detrimental to the Indonesian populace. These elements render the certificate invalid and can offer the rights holders legislative certainty. For the government to take action, specifically by enacting Regulation Minister Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Body Regulation Number 3 of 2023 about the Issuance of Electronic Documents in Land Registration Activities (PM 3/2023). This regulation elicits varied responses across societal strata; some individuals embrace it as a means of modernization that streamlines the process of establishing property rights and offers legal security and protection for landowners. Conversely, a significant portion of the community opposes this regulation, as they remain skeptical of the digital system and question the validity of a digital card as proof of legal land ownership. This article aims to examine the legal validity of e-certificates as evidence of land ownership and to address the challenges and solutions associated with transitioning from physical certificates to e-certificates in Indonesia. This writing and research employ a normative legal research methodology, wherein the author will conduct an investigation based on literary sources, prioritizing this approach. Legal statutes and regulations pertinent to Indonesia. This research use descriptive analytical approaches to elucidate the situation under inquiry and analyze it based on secondary data derived from legal papers. This paper’s findings indicate that the e-certificate mechanism can offer legal certainty to the community and facilitate the acquisition of digital land ownership records, free from damage, forgery, and overlapping rights.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:epw:politi:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:8169
DOI: 10.24018/ejpolitics.2025.4.2.169
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:4:y:2025:i:2:id:8169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.