IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/politi/v2y2023i5id8103.html

Omissions in the Implementation of Public Consultations in the Procedure of Adopting General Acts Through the Practice of the High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Gordan Struić

    (Office of the President of the Croatian Parliament, Croatia)

Abstract

Croatian local and regional self-government units are obliged to conduct public consultations when adopting general acts that affect the interests of citizens and legal entities. Bearing that in mind, the aim of this paper is to determine whether there are certain omissions – confirmed by the High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia – in the implementation of public consultations in the procedure of adopting general acts and, if there are, what they consist of. To this aim, the paper analyzes the decisions of the mentioned Court in procedures for assessing the legality of general acts adopted by local and regional self-government units. After the first introductory part, the second part briefly explains the normative framework, the third part states the methodology used, the fourth part analyzes the judicial practice, and in the fifth part, concluding remarks are stated. The analysis shows that since 2013, when the obligation to conduct public consultation was introduced, the Court has abolished 11 general acts. In the process of adopting those acts, the public consultation procedure was not conducted in accordance with the law: the first and the most common reason for contesting the general act was the absence of public consultation, and the second reason for that was non-compliance with the prescribed deadline of 30 days. Although practice has shown some other reasons as well, they all boil down to the fact that public consultation was not conducted.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:2:y:2023:i:5:id:8103
DOI: 10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.5.103
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics/article/view/8103
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics/article/download/8103/1368
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.5.103?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:2:y:2023:i:5:id:8103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.