IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/politi/v2y2023i1id8053.html

Analysis of Diversion Arrangements in the Beijing Rules and the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Vivi Nurqalbi

    (University of Tadulako, Indonesia)

Abstract

Diversion is very important to pay attention to in handling children of delinquent perpetrators, because it can prevent children from the stigmatization process that usually occurs in the process of criminalizing children through the juvenile justice system. In terms of protecting the best interests of children, diversion arrangements can be found in several international legal instruments such as The Beijing Rules, and in national legal instruments such as the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Act. The purpose of this study is to examine the diversion arrangements in The Beijing Rules and their arrangements in the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia, then to examine these two arrangements. The research method used is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that the purpose of diversion in The Beijing Rules is not fully seen in the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Because even though the provisions for diversion have been regulated, the existence of space that diversion can be pursued at the stages of investigation, prosecution and examination at trial has resulted in cases still being included in the juvenile justice system by giving a stronger stigma to children who are in conflict with the law.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:2:y:2023:i:1:id:8053
DOI: 10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.1.53
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics/article/view/8053
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics/article/download/8053/1343
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejpolitics.2023.2.1.53?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:politi:v:2:y:2023:i:1:id:8053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/politics .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.