Author
Listed:
- Kelvin Kangwa Kakumbi
(University of Lusaka, Zambia)
- Nathan Kamanga
(University of Lusaka, Zambia)
Abstract
Introduction: The Kutuba campaign was implemented in Monze District, Zambia, as part of the Resolution to Revolution (R2R) project to influence sustainable hygiene behaviour change among healthcare facility (HCF) staff. The effectiveness of the campaign was evaluated by comparing key hygiene practices between HCFs where the campaign was implemented and those where it was not. Methods: A case-control study design was used. Data were collected from 24 HCFs and 58 staff members using semi-structured questionnaires and direct observations. Statistical analysis involved two-sample proportion tests and chi-square tests to determine the effect of campaign exposure. Results: The odds of following correct handwashing steps were 6.27 times higher for exposed respondents (95% CI: 1.56–25.25). This means that there is a significant improvement in correctly following the steps during handwashing by facility staff at exposed HCFs compared to HCFs not exposed. Similarly, exposed respondents had 3.71 times higher odds of drying their hands properly (95% CI: 1.15–11.89). Significant differences were observed in waste management practices, such as the presence of incinerators and ash pits, in exposed HCFs compared with non-exposed HCFs. However, the time spent on hand washing and the frequency of surface cleaning showed no significant differences. Conclusion: The Kutuba campaign effectively improved specific hygiene practices in the exposed HCFs. The campaign’s participatory and community-centered approach demonstrates the potential for sustainable hygiene behaviour change.
Suggested Citation
Kelvin Kangwa Kakumbi & Nathan Kamanga, 2025.
"Effectiveness of the Kutuba Campaign in Promoting Sustainable Hygiene Practices: A Comparative Study in Monze District, Southern Zambia,"
European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 7(5), pages 7-12, September.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:7:y:2025:i:5:id:42299
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2025.7.5.2299
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:7:y:2025:i:5:id:42299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.