IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v7y2025i3id42306.html

The Relationship between Group B Streptococcus Infection in the Vagina with C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Levels in Pregnant Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

Author

Listed:
  • I Nyoman Hariyasa Sanjaya

    (Ngoerah General Hospital, Indonesia)

  • Evert Solomon Pangkahila

    (Ngoerah General Hospital, Indonesia)

  • I Wayan Rivandi Pradiyadnya Mardana

    (Ngoerah General Hospital, Indonesia)

Abstract

Background: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a significant obstetric complication, contributing to increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection is a key factor associated with PPROM, inducing inflammation and weakening of the fetal membranes. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin are biomarkers of inflammation that may aid in early detection of GBS infection in pregnant women with PPROM. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 64 pregnant women with PPROM treated at Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, from March 2023 to May 2024. Vaginal and rectal swabs were cultured to identify GBS. Serum CRP and procalcitonin levels were measured. Pearson correlation and chi-square tests were used to analyze the relationship between GBS infection and these biomarkers. Results: The prevalence of GBS infection among participants was 50%. CRP levels were significantly higher in GBS-positive cases (mean 7.88 mg/L) compared to GBS-negative cases (mean 3.43 mg/L; p = 0.038), with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.824). Procalcitonin levels were also elevated in GBS-positive cases (mean 0.066 ng/mL) vs. GBS-negative cases (mean 0.031 ng/mL; p = 0.044), showing a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.567). Sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 76.5% for CRP and 75% and 69.5% for procalcitonin, respectively. CRP demonstrated a prevalence ratio (PR) of 4.16, indicating a stronger association with GBS infection compared to procalcitonin (PR 3.08). Conclusion: Both CRP and procalcitonin are valuable markers for diagnosing GBS infection in pregnant women with PPROM. CRP exhibits stronger diagnostic performance and is recommended as the primary biomarker. Procalcitonin serves as a complementary tool, enhancing the diagnostic process. These findings underscore the importance of integrating these markers into clinical practice to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • I Nyoman Hariyasa Sanjaya & Evert Solomon Pangkahila & I Wayan Rivandi Pradiyadnya Mardana, 2025. "The Relationship between Group B Streptococcus Infection in the Vagina with C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Levels in Pregnant Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 7(3), pages 74-80, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:7:y:2025:i:3:id:42306
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2025.7.3.2306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/42306
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/42306/10701
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2025.7.3.2306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:7:y:2025:i:3:id:42306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.