Author
Listed:
- Mamo Woldu Kassa
(Princess Marina Hospital, Botswana)
- Alemayehu Ginbo Bedada
(Princess Marina Hospital, Botswana)
Abstract
Spinal anaesthesia, though safe, poses a risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), with its incidence and risk factors undocumented in Botswana. A prospective cross-sectional study of 600 cesarean section patients (February–July 2024) was conducted. PDPH was diagnosed using the International Headache Society guidelines. Independent variables included age, BMI, care provider experience, number of spinal anaesthesia attempts, and previous history of PDPH, with PDPH as the dependent variable. A total of 600 patients successfully underwent spinal anaesthesia for cesarean sections. The median age, weight, and height were 30 years, 73.0 kg, and 1.6 meters, respectively, with 80.0% having a BMI > 24.9. The overall PDPH rate was 11.8%. Most PDPH cases occurred within the first 24 hours (66.2%), presenting primarily as mild frontal–occipital headaches (97.2%). A significantly higher rate of PDPH was observed in patients with a history of PDPH (38.9% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.012). Multiparous women experienced a higher rate of PDPH compared to primiparous women (12.7% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.302), though this difference was not statistically significant. Two attempts at spinal anaesthesia were associated with a significantly higher rate of PDPH compared to one attempt (16.7% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.012) and three attempts (16.7% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.023), while no significant difference was observed between one and three attempts (8.8% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.950). PDPH rates did not differ significantly among nurse anaesthetists, medical officers, and residents (p-values 0.547, 0.364, and 0.851, respectively). Additionally, provider experience ( 2 years) did not significantly influence PDPH rates (p = 0.397). The prevalence of PDPH was 11.8%, with a history of PDPH identified as a significant risk factor. Including potential PDPH in the consent process, particularly for patients with a prior history, and implementing procedural refinements may help reduce its occurrence.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:7:y:2025:i:3:id:42301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.