IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v6y2024i5id42198.html

Evaluation and Improving Treatment Plans of Gated Radiotherapy in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients Using Respiratory Motion Management System for Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (DIBH)

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Khairul Islam

    (Cancer Center, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Bangladesh)

  • Md. Saiful Islam

    (Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh)

  • A. H. M. Ruhul Quddus

    (Physics, Natural Science, National University, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Zulkar Naen

    (Cancer Center, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Bangladesh)

  • Niloy Kumar

    (Cancer Center, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Bangladesh)

  • Nahida Sultana

    (Cancer Center, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Bangladesh)

Abstract

Background: One essential part of treating breast cancer is radiation therapy. Patients with breast cancer are more likely to develop cardiac problems and die if they accidentally expose their hearts to radiation. In order to minimize radiation exposure to the heart, the deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH) has been implemented into clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the use of the Varian Respiratory Motion Management System (RGSC) for radiation application in DIBH, with a focus on dosimetric plan comparison and treatment planning during free breathing (FB) and DIBH Methods and Material: This prospective clinical trial comprised 100 patients with left-sided breast cancer who had undergone breast-conserving surgery. Gating control and the RGS system were employed for therapy application. Analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) was used to generate dual treatment plans after CT data were obtained in FB and DIBH. Using the Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), dosimetric output parameters of organs at risk were compared. Results: The RGSC is connected to the LINAC systems and enables con- tinuous, touchless respiratory motion tracking using a camera. After each patient underwent dual treatment planning, 50 patients received treatment in Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) using DIBH, while 50 more patients received treatment in IMRT using Free Breath (FB). The mean cardiac dose reduction for DIBH in these patients was 7.23 to 3.41 Gy when compared to FB. Conclusion: The current data demonstrate that RT could greatly lower mean doses to the heart and high-dose locations by implementing the DIBH approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Khairul Islam & Md. Saiful Islam & A. H. M. Ruhul Quddus & Mohammad Zulkar Naen & Niloy Kumar & Nahida Sultana, 2024. "Evaluation and Improving Treatment Plans of Gated Radiotherapy in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients Using Respiratory Motion Management System for Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (DIBH)," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 6(5), pages 69-77, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:6:y:2024:i:5:id:42198
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2024.6.5.2198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/42198
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/42198/10378
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2024.6.5.2198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:6:y:2024:i:5:id:42198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.