Author
Listed:
- I Made Darmayasa
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
- Made Bagus Dwi Aryana
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
- William Alexander Setiawan
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
- Gede Eka Rusdi Antara
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
Abstract
Background: Operations in the pelvic area including cesarean section are often followed by unwanted events in the form of missing surgical instruments. The surgical device that is most often left behind during operations is surgical gauze and is known as a gossypiboma. Surgical gauze is often left in body cavities such as the peritoneum, pelvis, and retroperitoneal spaces. This surgical gauze can remain in the body for days, months, or even years before manifesting clinically. A granulomatous reaction around the surgical gauze may produce exudate followed by the formation of an abscess or fibrotic mass. Objective: To see the aspect of patient safety in cases of gossypiboma after cesarean section. Methods: Serial report of gossypiboma cases after cesarean section. Results and Discussion: Three cases of gossyfiboma were reported after cesarean section in Bali in 2017-2018. The diagnosis is made clinically according to complaints, and history of cesarean section and supported by supporting examinations such as BOF (Book-on-Filter), Ultra Sonography, and Computerized Tomography-Scan. Various surgical procedures were performed including sub-total colectomy laparotomy, right hemicolectomy laparotomy, and Hartman procedure laparotomy. All operations went well with good results too. Patient safety approaches and procedures must be carried out strictly to prevent a recurrence. Conclusion: Reports of three cases of gossypiboma after caesarean section are strongly related to patient safety procedures that are not performed in the operating room.
Suggested Citation
I Made Darmayasa & Made Bagus Dwi Aryana & William Alexander Setiawan & Gede Eka Rusdi Antara, 2023.
"Gossypiboma Post Cesarean Section: Patient Safety Review,"
European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 5(5), pages 51-54, September.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:5:y:2023:i:5:id:41712
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.5.1712
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:5:y:2023:i:5:id:41712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.