Author
Listed:
- David Salo
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
- Anna Beth Johnson
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
- Devansh Pandey
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
- Jonathan Pierce
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
- Barnet Eskin
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
- Michael Silverman
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
- Lev Paley
(Morristown Medical Center, USA)
Abstract
Acute ankle sprains are treated with ice, elevation, immobilization, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Resolution typically takes days. Osteopathic physicians utilize manipulation for a variety of joint disorders and injuries. Few have been studied in randomized controlled trials and many allopathic physicians are unaware of their utility. One manipulation, a modified muscle energy release technique, appears to offer promise for the treatment of acute ankle injuries, potentially returning patients to function more quickly than standard treatment alone. This study involved a comparison of a modified muscle energy release technique with standard treatment to standard treatment alone in the emergency department (ED) setting for patients with acute ankle injuries. This is an IRB approved, randomized single-blind sham-controlled study on a convenience sample of ED patients with pain from acute inversion injury. The study was set in a suburban ED with a 3-year Emergency Medicine Residency and an annual volume of 80,000. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-55 years; a Grade I or II acute ankle sprain less than 48 hours old; initial VAS scores ≥ 35; and being able to take 4 steps in the ED. We excluded fractures and Grade III injuries. The experimental manipulation technique involved placing the ankle into position of injury (inversion) for over 90 seconds and then bringing the ankle back to a neutral position over 90 seconds against mild hand resistance. The sham manipulation was similar but with plantar-flexion manipulation instead Patients were evaluated pre and 5 minutes after manipulation and 2 days later with a 100mm VAS pain scale completed by the patient after taking 4 steps. 17 patients were enrolled, 7 in the experimental (E) and 10 in the sham (S) group; 7 (41%) were female. There was no difference between groups for age (E=32; S=32 years p=0.9), gender (p=0.9), time from injury (E=7 vs S=11 hours; p=0.4) or initial VAS (E= 51 mm (SD 27); S= 57 mm (SD 20) (p=0.7). Both groups had similar distributions of pain (see schematic). There was no difference in mean pain relief between groups immediately after manipulation E=2.4mm (-11.0-15.88, 95%CI) vs S= 7.2mm (0.08-14.8, 95%CI) (p=0.4) or 2 days later E=29.1mm 1mm (8.5-49.7, 95%CI) S=26 (7.7 95%CI (p=0.8). Muscle energy release for acute ankle sprain does not improve pain immediately or in 2 days compared to standard treatment.
Suggested Citation
David Salo & Anna Beth Johnson & Devansh Pandey & Jonathan Pierce & Barnet Eskin & Michael Silverman & Lev Paley, 2023.
"A Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of a Fascia Release Technique for the Treatment of Acute Ankle Sprains,"
European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 5(4), pages 117-120, July.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:5:y:2023:i:4:id:41553
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.4.1553
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:5:y:2023:i:4:id:41553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.