IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v5y2023i3id41284.html

Comparison between Figo and Nichd Criteria in Assessing Fetal Heart Rate

Author

Listed:
  • I Gde Sastra Winata

    (Sanglah General Hospital, Indonesia)

  • William Alexander Setiawan

    (Udayana University, Indonesia)

  • Jonathan Adrian

    (Udayana University, Indonesia)

  • Gede Odi Bayu Dharma Perkasa

    (Udayana University, Indonesia)

  • Joanne Roxanne

    (Udayana University, Indonesia)

Abstract

Assessing the fetal heart rate (FHR) is one of the most important aspects of antenatal care and delivery. Fetal heart rate is one indicator of fetal well-being. Assessing FHR can be done by auscultation or by using a cardiotocography (KTG) device, also known as an Electronic Fetal Monitor (EFM). In interpreting the results of the cardiotocography examination, there are two criteria used to interpret the condition of the fetus, namely the criteria issued by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).

Suggested Citation

  • I Gde Sastra Winata & William Alexander Setiawan & Jonathan Adrian & Gede Odi Bayu Dharma Perkasa & Joanne Roxanne, 2023. "Comparison between Figo and Nichd Criteria in Assessing Fetal Heart Rate," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-3, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:5:y:2023:i:3:id:41284
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.3.1284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/41284
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/41284/9724
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2023.5.3.1284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:5:y:2023:i:3:id:41284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.