Author
Listed:
- Sunil Munakomi
(College of Medical Sciences, Nepal)
- Dipak Chaulagain
(Uzhhorod National University, Ukraine)
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound Optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound (ONSD) assessment is a non-invasive, bedside, and easily repeatable tool for dynamic measurement of intracranial pressure with high diagnostic accuracy. The goal of this study was to find out if an ONSD can accurately predict the findings of the progression of intracranial lesions in computed tomography (CT) scans and associated deterioration in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among neurosurgical patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective analysis of ONSD assessment among 54 patients admitted to neurosurgical intensive care unit for clinical and radiological evaluation of raised intracranial pressure. Both horizontal and vertical optic nerve sheath diameters were measured 3 mm beneath the globe in each eye using a 7.5-10MHz ultrasonography probe. A binocular change in optic nerve sheath diameter of more than 2.00 mm in two consecutive readings in the same patient was deemed abnormal. The accuracy of ONSD was correlated with the concurrent neurological deterioration in the GCS and the progression of lesions in the CT images. Results: When compared to CT scan progression, ONSD assessment had 86.7% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity for detecting elevated ICP. The Receiver operating curve (ROC) for the change in ONSD had a high ability to predict progression in ICP with the area under curve (AUC) value of 0.882. The drop in GCS with respect to CT progression of lesions has an AUC value of 0.849. The drop in GCS while compared to progressive lesions in CT images had a positive predictive value of 80% and the negative predictive value of 89.7% respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of bedside ONSD ultrasonography in predicting raised intracranial pressure are significant when compared to the progression of lesions in CT images and concurrent drop in GCS. A bedside ONSD measurement is therefore a reliable armamentarium to predict elevated ICP since it is cheap, non-invasive, and repeatable.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:6:id:41583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.