IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v4y2022i6id41464.html

Lactobacillus Species Isolates and Vaginal Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Women of Reproductive Age Attending Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi

Author

Listed:
  • Chidozie V. Udeogu

    (Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria)

  • Nneka R. Agbakoba

    (Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria)

  • Lilian N. Chukwuma

    (Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria)

  • Chukwudi D. Obiegbu

    (Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria)

  • Eucharia A. Dilibe

    (Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria)

  • Somadina I. Okwelogu

    (Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria)

  • Uchenna C. Aguchibe

    (Peaceland College of Health Technology, Nigeria)

Abstract

The association between vaginal Lactobacillus spp and regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines have been reviewed. This study was done to evaluate the relationship between the presence of Lactobacillus spp isolated in the vagina of women of reproductive age resident in Nnewi and vaginal tissue pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-ᵞ) levels. A total of 220 women of reproductive age (pregnant and non-pregnant women) aged between 18-45 years who attended Obstetrics and Gynaecology clinics at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH) Nnewi and had been classified according to their clinical Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)- status, were enrolled for the study. Two vaginal swabs samples were obtained from each woman. The first swab was used for cultivation and isolation of Lactobacillus spp, while the second swab used for evaluation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-ᵞ). Within the study population, women who were noted to be non-pregnant and clinically BV-positive had significantly higher mean levels of Pro-inflammatory cytokines (PC); TNF-α (57.90±27.26 pg/ml) and IFN-ᵞ (168.98±100 pg/ml) compared non-pregnant women who were BV-negative with TNF-α (13.48±4.67 pg/ml) and IFN-ᵞ (29.56 pg/ml). Comparison between both groups showed statistically significant difference (p 0.05). Non-pregnant participants in which Lactobacillus iners were isolated had the highest up-regulation of PC; TNF-α (55.80 pg/ml) and IFN-ᵞ (149.9 pg/ml) compared with other women in the same group who had Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus acidophilus isolated from their vaginal samples. In pregnant women, subjects with Lactobacillus plantarum isolated had the highest up-regulation of PC; TNF-α (75.63 pg/ml) and IFN-ᵞ (163.63 pg/ml) compared to women who had other Lactobacillus spp isolated from their vaginal swabs. It is inferred by this study the presence of L.iners has a remarkable association with the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines which promote pathological process in the vaginal disease states. The potential for the deployment of L.iners as a promising potential algorithm and biomarker in the detection of vaginosis and vaginitis is noted in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Chidozie V. Udeogu & Nneka R. Agbakoba & Lilian N. Chukwuma & Chukwudi D. Obiegbu & Eucharia A. Dilibe & Somadina I. Okwelogu & Uchenna C. Aguchibe, 2022. "Lactobacillus Species Isolates and Vaginal Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Women of Reproductive Age Attending Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH), Nnewi," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 4(6), pages 39-44, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:6:id:41464
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.6.1464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/41464
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/41464/9624
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.6.1464?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:6:id:41464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.