IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v4y2022i5id41482.html

Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Conservative Measures in Treatment of Chronic Axial Low Back Pain, A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Author

Listed:
  • Tarek S. Shafshak

    (Alexandria University, Egypt)

  • Mazen M. Fakhry

    (Alexandria University, Egypt)

  • Ahmed R. Abdelfadil

    (Alexandria University, Egypt)

  • Mayada F. Noaiem

    (Alexandria University, Egypt)

  • Hoda M. A. Abdel-Naby

    (Alexandria University, Egypt)

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a very common disorder with various management strategies. There is still debate regarding treatment alternatives for axial CLBP. This study aimed to compare the effect of epidural steroid injection (ESI), interferential current (IFC) therapy and core strengthening exercises in a prospective randomized controlled manner. Hence, sixty patients complaining of axial CLBP were included and randomly assigned into either a group of ESI and exercises (group A) or IFC and exercises (group B) or exercises only (group C); each group was of 20 patients. Outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) for function and Beck's depression inventory (BDI) for depression, assessed at baseline and 3-, 6- and 12-week follow-ups. At the start of the study, there were no significant differences between the three groups in age, gender, cause and duration of CLBP, body mass index, abdominal muscle power, muscle spasm or tenderness (p > 0.05). Significant improvement in VAS and ODI at 3-, 6- and 12-weeks was observed compared to baseline assessment in the three studied groups. The improvement was higher for group A compared to B and C. BDI was significantly improved in group A and C at 3 weeks, and in all groups at 6- and 12-weeks compared to baseline. However, at the end of the study, there was no significant difference in the BDI between the three groups. From this study and over a period of 3 months, all studied groups showed improvement in pain, function, and depression but the group who received epidural steroid injection with core strengthening exercises was statistically better than the other two groups, with significant improvement in pain and function, but not in depression. Early effective assessment and dealing with depression, even prophylactic treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy should be addressed. Trial registration: The Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) identification number is PACTR201901523042787 on 16 January 2019.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarek S. Shafshak & Mazen M. Fakhry & Ahmed R. Abdelfadil & Mayada F. Noaiem & Hoda M. A. Abdel-Naby, 2022. "Epidural Steroid Injection Versus Conservative Measures in Treatment of Chronic Axial Low Back Pain, A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 4(5), pages 47-51, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:5:id:41482
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.5.1482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/41482
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/41482/9553
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.5.1482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:5:id:41482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.