Author
Listed:
- Spandan Chaudhary
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Disha Patel
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Kavisha Vyas
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Pooja Chaudhary
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Prathana Singhania
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Juhi Patel
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Ekta Jajodia
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Nilay Dave
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Shiv Patel
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Ramachandiran Sivaramakrishnan
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Mayank Patadiya
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Tushar Sonagara
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Ashish Hirpara
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
- Neeraj Arora
(Unipath Specialty Laboratory Ltd, India)
Abstract
Real time PCR (RT-PCR) detection method is the widely used for COVID-19 virus detection. This includes sample collection in viral transport medium (VTM), viral RNA extraction followed by detection of virus using fluorescence dye-based system using RT-PCR machine. Several studies have demonstrated a new method which replaces the extraction step by a simple method involving DTT and Proteinase-K and heat treatment. ICMR and few other governing bodies have approved such protocols but are they appropriate in clinical context? In present study, we tried to evaluate one such protocol by using ICMR and WHO approved COVID-19 detection protocol (of CoviPath™ COVID-19 RT-PCR Kit) by replacing RNA extraction step. We used 228 clinical COVID-19 samples for studying method which includes 176 positive (CT values from 14 to 23; 24 to 31 and 32 to 37 were considered as high, moderate and low positive respectively) and 52 negative nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs samples. We got 100% concordant results with negative samples and 92% concordant and 8% non-concordant results for positive samples. Non-concordant results are with low positive samples. Low level of positivity in the samples could indicate the initial/end stage of COVID-19 disease. If they are at the initial stage, they can be the potential carrier and spread the disease. Authors believe that direct methods can be used for screening bit not for diagnosis of COVID-19 disease.
Suggested Citation
Spandan Chaudhary & Disha Patel & Kavisha Vyas & Pooja Chaudhary & Prathana Singhania & Juhi Patel & Ekta Jajodia & Nilay Dave & Shiv Patel & Ramachandiran Sivaramakrishnan & Mayank Patadiya & Tushar , 2022.
"SARS-CoV-2 Direct Real Time PCR without RNA Extraction: Appropriate Method or Not?,"
European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 4(1), pages 41-47, January.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:1:id:41164
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.1.1164
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:4:y:2022:i:1:id:41164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.