IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v2y2020i6id40585.html

Improvements of the US BI-RADS Assessment – A Necessity for a Non-Invasive Positive and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Application of the New Full Breast Ultrasonography Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Aristida Colan-Georges

    (Prima Medical MedLife; Pan Med Laboratories, Romania)

Abstract

Objective: Despite the engineering progress, the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) is unsatisfactory due to less specific descriptors and non-anatomical scanning and interpretation, proving that physicians lag behind technology. We aimed to improve the noninvasive positive and differential diagnosis of BC using modern technology applied to the new integrative concept of Full Breast Ultrasonography (FBU): anatomical radial scanning, color Doppler and Strain Sonoelastography (SE). Methods: We analyzed retrospectively 1841 consecutive FBUs in 1333 patients from screening, diagnosis, or follow-up, in two centers. We searched three descriptors: the ductal connection of the lesions, the incident angle of the plunging artery, and the SE (Ueno score). We compared the initial BI-RADS assessment with pathological reports or follow-up examinations of benign findings. Results: Radial scanning and ductal connection provided a standardized examination of the entire breast, with 100% sensitivity, early detection, precise location, and easy follow-up. We found no correlation BC-Density-Age, but a significant association BC - Benign pathology. The benign lesions, usually multiple, associated the proliferative and secretory types. The incident angle of the plunging artery was the best descriptor for the BC mass-type and associated with a score 4 or 5 Ueno led to PPV of 97.01%, specificity of 99.67%, and accuracy of 99.69%. Inflammatory BC illustrated high glandular strain and diffuse hyperemia. Conclusion: FBU had optimal accuracy, independent of the mammographic model, in screening and diagnosis. The vascular angle correlated with strain SE (adapted to the breast heterogeneity) raised the specificity and is recommended for inclusion in US BI-RADS.

Suggested Citation

  • Aristida Colan-Georges, 2020. "Improvements of the US BI-RADS Assessment – A Necessity for a Non-Invasive Positive and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Application of the New Full Breast Ultrasonography Concept," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:6:id:40585
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/40585
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/40585/9072
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:6:id:40585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.