IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v2y2020i6id40579.html

Vaginal or Caesarean Delivery? A Comparative Study of Factors Associated with the Choice Method of Childbirth Delivery in Kenya and Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert Omedi

    (Kaimosi Friends University College, Kenya)

  • Margaret Mwaila

    (National Council for Population and Development, Kenya)

  • Sarafina Wanja

    (Social Researcher and Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, Kenya)

Abstract

Background: Childbirth delivery today is becoming a complex process. There exist linkages between choice method of childbirth delivery, whether vaginal or caesarean section, and socioeconomic, maternal, and pregnancy-related factors. Study objectives: To compare the choice method of childbirth delivery among women of childbearing ages in Kenya and Egypt. Specifically, the study sought to (a) show patterns of caesarean section births in the two countries using women’s background characteristics, (b) estimate levels and differentials of caesarean births in the two countries and, (c) investigate the socio-economic, maternal and pregnancy-related factors that determine the choice of caesarean section deliveries in the two countries Data and methods: Data was derived from the 2014 Kenya and Egypt demographic and health surveys women-file. The data was fitted in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences in which descriptive and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Majority of Egyptian women (53.5%) gave birth by caesarean section compared to Kenyan women (7.8%). At descriptive analysis level, all the study variables were significant at ρ

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert Omedi & Margaret Mwaila & Sarafina Wanja, 2020. "Vaginal or Caesarean Delivery? A Comparative Study of Factors Associated with the Choice Method of Childbirth Delivery in Kenya and Egypt," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:6:id:40579
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/40579
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/40579/9077
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:6:id:40579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.