IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v2y2020i6id40554.html

Barriers to Learning During Clinical Rotations in the Emergency Department: The Perspective of Students in a Public Sector Institute of a Developing Country

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Muhammad Jawad Zaidi

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

  • Hamza Waqar Bhatti

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

  • Mehwish Kaneez

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

  • Fazila Hassan

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

  • Abdullah Bin Zubair

    (Rashid Latif Medical College, Pakistan)

  • Syed Faheem Bukhari

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Waqar Younas

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Zubair Satti

    (Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan)

Abstract

Background: Clinical learning is the crux of medical education. Students perceive many barriers to effective clinical learning due to transition, poor supervision, and lack of orientation. There is an urgent need for recommendations to alleviate these barriers and improve the quality of medical education in a public sector institute of a developing country. Aims: The study aims to identify the barriers in clinical learning perceived by the students during their clinical rotations in emergency. The study also aims to provide recommendations to alleviate these barriers. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted among 300 students from a public sector institute of Pakistan. The perception of clinical learning was assessed using a structured questionnaire in students attending medical and surgical emergency ward. Independent samples t-test and ANOVA were used to assess differences in perception scores across gender and academic years. Results: The mean perception score was 52.0±11.74. There was a significant difference in perception scores across academic years (p=0.028) with the final year having lower perception scores than the junior students. The mean scores of items in domain 1 (Transition and stress) and domain 4 (Supervision and feedback) were lower indicating a negative perception in these domains. Conclusions: Lack of clinical orientation, non-integration of the clinical curriculum in preclinical years, poor supervision, lack of resources, and a crippled feedback delivery system are barriers to clinical learning. Interventions such as integration of clinically orientated curriculum, teacher training, student-centered teaching methodology, and development of an effective feedback delivery system must be employed for quality clinical learning during rotations.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Muhammad Jawad Zaidi & Hamza Waqar Bhatti & Mehwish Kaneez & Fazila Hassan & Abdullah Bin Zubair & Syed Faheem Bukhari & Muhammad Waqar Younas & Muhammad Zubair Satti, 2020. "Barriers to Learning During Clinical Rotations in the Emergency Department: The Perspective of Students in a Public Sector Institute of a Developing Country," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:6:id:40554
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/40554
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/40554/9088
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.6.554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:6:id:40554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.