Author
Listed:
- Tasnuva Tunna
(Primeasia University, Bangladesh.)
- Mst. Sharmin Akter
- Mahmuda Parvin
- Md. Jilhaz
- Shamema Jahan
- Zaidul ISM
(International Islamic University, Malaysia.)
Abstract
This is a continuation of our “Stress Management with Herbal Alternatives” project whereby we are testing traditionally used herbs to scientifically establish their efficacy as anxiolytics for the 1st time. For the current study Bamboo leaf tea, Mint leaf tea and Clitoral bush petal tea were compared for their anxiolytic potency. Male Swiss albino mice were used to test on Open Field test (OFT) and Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) anxiety model. Diazepam (at the dose of 0.25mg/kg body weight) was used as standard and Bangladeshi indigenous bamboo aka Bambusa polymorpha or Bamboo, Mentha piperita or Mint and Clitoria ternatea or Clitoral Bush (at doses of 1g/kg body weight) were the sample. The control group had no intervention. For OFT we tested line crossing, time spent in center, time spent in thigmotaxis and for EPM we measured the number of entry in open and closed hands, time spent in the open and closed hands. Parameters such as rearing, grooming, urination and defecation were also monitored for both tests.The trial results showed Clitoral bush and Mint leaves to have greater anxiolytic activity than Bamboo and Diazepam. Bamboo and Clitoral Bush helped in weight loss, wherelse Diazepam caused weight gain. Based on all criteria, Clitoral bush tea showed highest potential to reduce stress as well as stress related obesity. Results were followed by mint, diazepam and bamboo respectively in their potency for anxiolytic effect.
Suggested Citation
Tasnuva Tunna & Mst. Sharmin Akter & Mahmuda Parvin & Md. Jilhaz & Shamema Jahan & Zaidul ISM, 2020.
"A Comparative in Vivo Study on Bambusa Polymorpha, Mentha Piperita and Clitoria Ternatea as Alternative Anxiolytic,"
European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), May.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:3:id:40266
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.3.266
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:3:id:40266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.