IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v2y2020i3id40221.html

Serious Liver Trauma: Predictive Factors Of Therapeutic Choice And Prognostic Factors (About 65 Cases)

Author

Listed:
  • K. Elhattabi

    (Visceral Surgery Emergency Department, University hospital Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Morocco)

  • A. Bachar

    (Visceral Surgery Emergency Department, University hospital Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Morocco)

  • F. Z. Bensardi

    (Visceral Surgery Emergency Department, University hospital Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Morocco)

  • K. Mourid

    (Visceral Surgery Emergency Department, University hospital Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Morocco)

  • A. Fadil

    (Visceral Surgery Emergency Department, University hospital Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Morocco)

Abstract

The charge of the severe hepatic traumas underwent a radical change from exclusive surgical treatment to non-operative-based conservative approach that benefited from the recent advances in the field of imagery as well as from the follow-up strategies of intensive care. A retrospective survey was carried out involving 65 patients treated for serious liver traumas in the surgical emergency department of Ibn Rochd university hospital of Casablanca. The aim of this study is to assess our act refunding SLT through the definition of the evolutionary, therapeutic, diagnostic, and epidemiological data. All the penetrating and blunt SLT were included in this survey. The seriousness was defined by the hemodynamic instability and a lesion stage higher to III according to the MIRVIS rating. The clinical and paraclinical data as well as morbidity and mortality were analysed. Traffic accidents were the main cause of SLT our series is mainly composed of young male subjects (54 men, 83%). There were 86% of blunt traumas (56 cases) there was common polytrauma (78,5%). Ultrasound and CT scans were performed to most patients (respectively 83% and 78%). Fifty one patients had non operative treatment (78,5%) whereas 14 patients underwent surgery. This option was due to their hemodynamic instability and not the hepatic trauma lesion stage in the operative group, the evolution was complicate in 35,7% of the operated patients whereas in the non operative group the complications supervened only in 23,5% of the cases. The mortality rate was respectively 28,5% versus 7,8% for the non operative treatment the NOT of the SLT allowed to obtain satisfactory results despite the seriousness of the hepatic lesions. It should be anted that the treatment choice was made mainly according to the hemodynamic condition and not to the radiological stage lesions A genuine and precocious agreement among the surgeon, the anesthesiologist and the interventional radiologist allowed to avoid the server complications following SLT so that the injured patient who could be initially rescued manage to escape first hour complications, and ultimately recover.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Elhattabi & A. Bachar & F. Z. Bensardi & K. Mourid & A. Fadil, 2020. "Serious Liver Trauma: Predictive Factors Of Therapeutic Choice And Prognostic Factors (About 65 Cases)," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:3:id:40221
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.3.221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/40221
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/40221/8948
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.3.221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:2:y:2020:i:3:id:40221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.