IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmed0/v1y2019i5id40121.html

Assessment of Oxidative Stress Changes in Serum and Follicular Fluid in Relevance to GnRH rival Protocol in Iraqi Infertile Ladies Undergoing ICSI

Author

Listed:
  • Fatimah Abdulrazaq Raheem

    (Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.)

  • Hayder A. L. Mossa

    (Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.)

  • Wasan A. Abdulhamed

    (Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.)

  • Liqaa R. Altamimi

    (Baghdad Specialist Center for Fertility and IVF, Baghdad, Iraq.)

Abstract

Background: Literary works about the role of rival convention in relationship with oxidative pressure are opposing and there is no reasonable agreement in distributed ripeness articles about the role of opponent reproduction convention with this respect. In reality, a few creators support the presence of expanded oxidative initiated oocyte harm in ladies experiencing ART's; regardless, others have denied such a perception. Hence, the present investigation was arranged so as to think about the conceivable oxidative or hostile to oxidative potential controlled by foe convention. Aim of the study: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the serum and follicular ROS concentration in women undergoing ICSI contrasted between two groups, one receiving conventional antagonist protocol and the other receiving conventional agonist protocol. Patients and Methods: The current case control study included two groups of subfertile women. The study group included 57 women receiving antagonist protocol, whereas, the control group included 10 subfertile women receiving agonist protocol. The study was carried out at High Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies at Al- Nahrain University. The study started on April 2018 and extended to March 2019. Women in both groups were subjected to ICSI procedure according to procedures and techniques adopted in High Institute of Infertility Diagnosis and Assisted Reproductive Technologies at Al- Nahrain University with a single basic difference concerning the ovarian stimulation protocol. Results: Overall clinical pregnancy rate was 44.7 % being significantly higher in antagonist group in comparison with agonist group 50.9 % versus 10.01 %, respectively (P = 0.019). There was no significant difference in the concentration of ROS at cycle day 2 between antagonist and agonistgroups (P = 0.561). There was highly significant difference in the serum concentration of ROS at day of ova pickup between antagonist and agonist groups (P = 0.009); being less in antagonistgroup and there was highly significant difference in the follicular fluid concentration of ROS between antagonist and agonist groups (P = 0.003); being less in antagonist group. Conclusions: Antagonist protocol is associated with significantly higher positive pregnancy outcome in comparison with agonist protocol because of the anti-oxidant effect attributed to antagonist use.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatimah Abdulrazaq Raheem & Hayder A. L. Mossa & Wasan A. Abdulhamed & Liqaa R. Altamimi, 2019. "Assessment of Oxidative Stress Changes in Serum and Follicular Fluid in Relevance to GnRH rival Protocol in Iraqi Infertile Ladies Undergoing ICSI," European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 1(5), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:1:y:2019:i:5:id:40121
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2019.1.5.121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/view/40121
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed/article/download/40121/8824
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmed.2019.1.5.121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:1:y:2019:i:5:id:40121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.