Author
Listed:
- Myo Nyein Aung
(Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.)
- Vorapol Jaroonvanichkul
(Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.)
- Jitladda Deerojanawong
(Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.)
- Juraiporn Somboonwong
(Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.)
- Ahmad Ishtiaq
(Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.)
- Pongsak Wannakrairot
(Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.)
Abstract
This study tested a new method of standard setting which does not need judges’ decision. Objectives: (1) to compare the minimum-passing-level ( MPL) of the new standard setting approach with that of a traditional method (Angoff’s Method); and (2) to find the best borderline group by analyzing five ranges of the students’ previous year’s Cumulative Grade Point Average (cGPA). Method: A range of previous year GPA around 2 was used to probe borderline group, the mean of which was applied as cut-off to decide pass and fail. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were applied to investigate the agreement between the pass/fail cut-scores of the new approach and Angoff’s Method. Result: The pass/fail cut-score of new method highly agreed MPL of Angoff’s Method: with AUC ranging from 0.91 to 1.0 in all analyses. Conclusion: This new approach would be an alternative to Angoff’s Method when subject-matter experts are not available or in order to avoid the making of subjective decisions by these experts. Key word: MPL, pass and fail, medical education, measurement, standard setting
Suggested Citation
Myo Nyein Aung & Vorapol Jaroonvanichkul & Jitladda Deerojanawong & Juraiporn Somboonwong & Ahmad Ishtiaq & Pongsak Wannakrairot, 2019.
"A New Method for Setting Standard in Medical Education, Applying Previous Year Cumulative GPA,"
European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, European Open Science, vol. 1(5), November.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:1:y:2019:i:5:id:40114
DOI: 10.24018/ejmed.2019.1.5.114
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmed0:v:1:y:2019:i:5:id:40114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmed .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.