IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmath/v7y2026i1id70297.html

Finite Volume-Based Numerical Investigation of Power-Law and QUICK Interpolation Schemes in Analyzing Confined Buoyancy-Driven Turbulent Flow Field

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Gatwiri

    (Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya)

  • Stephen Karanja

    (Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya)

  • Eustace Mwenda

    (Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya)

Abstract

Turbulent natural convection in confined settings is a common phenomenon in many thermal and engineering systems. Therefore, an accurate prediction of the flow field is essential for a reliable performance evaluation. Among the numerous prediction approaches, numerical methods are used, which largely complement experimentation. Confined buoyancy-driven turbulent flows are largely analyzed using the finite volume discretization approach owing to its strong conservation properties and flexibility in handling complex computational domains. However, the accuracy of finite volume-based numerical simulations largely depends on the interpolation scheme used to approximate the flow variables at the control volume faces. Consequently, a careful assessment of interpolation schemes is essential for improving numerical predictions. This study presents a scientific evaluation of the performance of the power-law and QUICK interpolation techniques in simulating the turbulent natural convection of air in a square cavity. Pressure-velocity coupling was attained using the pressure-implicit with splitting of operators; (PISO) algorithm, while turbulence was resolved using the SST k–ω turbulence model. The schemes were assessed based on numerical stability, convergence behavior, artificial diffusion, and their effectiveness in predicting primary flow and turbulence features in the interpolation of temperature, velocity, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent eddy viscosity across the faces of control volumes. The flow profiles were validated using experimental data. The numerical findings demonstrated that the QUICK scheme consistently provided superior predictions compared to the power-law interpolation scheme for all examined variables. These findings demonstrate that for the numerical analysis of confined buoyancy-driven turbulent flows at high Rayleigh numbers, QUICK offers improved reliability and accuracy compared to the power-law scheme.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmath:v:7:y:2026:i:1:id:70297
DOI: 10.24018/ejmath.2026.7.1.70297
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath/article/view/70297
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath/article/download/70297/14221
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmath.2026.7.1.70297?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmath:v:7:y:2026:i:1:id:70297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.