IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejmath/v4y2023i4id14230.html

Consistency and Ability of Students Using DINA and DINO Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Nasim Wafa
  • Ziauddin Zia
  • Fazlahmad Frozan

Abstract

There are two prevalent models for studying cognitive diagnosis Models for appraisement and diagnostics, each of these two models is the definite Input Noisy Output “and” gate and the Deterministic Input Noisy Output “or” gate models. The usage of them is to display various views of the ways cognitive skills are related and the probability of how an responds correctly. The aim of study is to compare the mentioned models and girls and boys with the modeling of cognitive diagnosis. The aims of this study to identify differences in performance of Afghan boys’ and girls’ students in the basic mathematical attributes and cognitive skills of the eighth grade in TIMMS (2011). As well as rankings among the countries that participated in TIMMS. Two commonly used CDMs were employed to fit the response data, including these two models (DINA and DINO). With the assistance of CDMs, we could obtain not only the item parameters, but also the skill profile for each student. Results show that the examinees do best in number domain while do worst in data and chance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Nasim Wafa & Ziauddin Zia & Fazlahmad Frozan, 2023. "Consistency and Ability of Students Using DINA and DINO Models," European Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, European Open Science, vol. 4(4), pages 7-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejmath:v:4:y:2023:i:4:id:14230
    DOI: 10.24018/ejmath.2023.4.4.230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath/article/view/14230
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath/article/download/14230/3219
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejmath.2023.4.4.230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejmath:v:4:y:2023:i:4:id:14230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejmath .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.