IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/y2023id63135.html

Choosing Digital Tools in Educational Scenarios: A Case Study with In-Service Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Evaggelia Sazakli

    (Philologist, ICT Educational Trainer, Greece)

Abstract

This paper examines the choices of digital tools made over traditional ones by 18 Greek teachers of foreign language, humanities, and arts, in educational scenarios during in-service blended training on script design. Each trainee submitted four scenarios and was free to select his/her own tools. Hierarchical cluster analysis performed on the participants, showed two groups, with the first group ending up with decreasing use of digital tools, whereas the other group exhibited a progressive increase, with constructive and collaborative categories being more popular. All disciplines increased the usage of communicative tools. Teachers of Humanities usually employ projections and Art teachers use more physical objects. Teachers of foreign languages tend to the fewest digital tools in every scenario. All trainees used more multidisciplinary tools than specialized ones; the latter was mostly applied by Art teachers. The research findings shed light on the trends revealed by teachers’ choices and enrich the knowledge base about the planning repertoires and logic of in-service teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Evaggelia Sazakli, 2023. "Choosing Digital Tools in Educational Scenarios: A Case Study with In-Service Teachers," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, pages 31-39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:y:2023:id:63135
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2023.1.CIE.3135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/63135
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/63135/13059
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2023.1.CIE.3135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:y:2023:id:63135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.