IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v9y2024i3id63146.html

Liquefaction Analysis of Four High Tailings Dams

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Ortigão

    (Terratek Int., CT, US)

  • Ana Cristina Sieira

    (University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

  • Flávia Santos

    (Terratek Ltd., Brazil)

  • Juliana Moraes

    (Terratek Ltd., Brazil)

  • Cristhiano Soares

    (Terratek Ltd., Brazil)

Abstract

This is the story of a long, 3-year study on the investigation of the liquefaction analyses of four tailings dams. All of them were built by the upstream construction method and initially considered unsafe. Before this study, liquid limit stability analyses on these four structures indicated a low factor of safety. This work aimed to carry out stress-strain analyses with the NorSand constitutive model. The work started in 2020 when most stress-strain commercial programs did not yet work with NorSand, but in due course, programs improved and enabled the use of this model. Most of the dams had limited in situ and laboratory tests. In situ tests in most dams were short and did not reach the bottom of the tailings. Existing laboratory tests, on the other hand, aimed only to yield strength parameters, not NorSand ones. The authors then used a mix of strength parameters and literature-recommended typical values. The final analysis results indicated that two of the dams were very unsafe, and two others were very safe. The authors compared the results of the liquefaction potential and safety factors obtained by reducing strength parameters. Despite the theoretical limitations of the parameter reduction technique, a good, inverted correlation was found. The authors concluded that limit equilibrium analyses of tailings may be misleading and should be avoided.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Ortigão & Ana Cristina Sieira & Flávia Santos & Juliana Moraes & Cristhiano Soares, 2024. "Liquefaction Analysis of Four High Tailings Dams," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 9(3), pages 47-56, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:9:y:2024:i:3:id:63146
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2024.9.3.3146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/63146
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/63146/13123
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2024.9.3.3146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:9:y:2024:i:3:id:63146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.