Author
Listed:
- Fahmida Munim Ani
(Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.)
- Md. Altaf Hossain
(Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.)
- Raha Nadoal Shahril
(Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.)
Abstract
Concrete is a significant construction material that is utilized extensively worldwide. A research study on the properties of concrete was conducted using Glass Waste (GW), which was readily available locally. As broken glass is difficult to sort, it is possible to positively utilize this waste particulate matter to reduce its detrimental impacts on both human health and the environment. Besides crushing or grinding, glass can transform into a natural pozzolan which enhances the fresh and hardened properties of concrete. This study also intends to reduce the amount of binding material used in the manufacturing of concrete blocks by making the best use of cement with Glass Waste. Therefore, an attempt has been made by using GW from 5-20% by weight as cement replacement for concrete blocks. When 5% crushed glass waste was added to the concrete mix (1:2:4), maximum compressive strength was 25.90 N/mm2, as opposed to Ordinary Cement Concrete's 21.09 N/mm2 strength, according to workability and laboratory testing. The 5% Glass Waste Mixed Cube and 5% Glass Waste Mixed Cylinder had the lowest water absorption test values at 2.22% and 3.58% respectively. In comparison to Ordinary Cement Concrete, Glass Waste Concrete has higher tensile strength. The maximum splitting tensile strength for 5% crushed Glass Waste Concrete was 2.115 N/mm2, compared to 1.815 N/mm2 for an Ordinary Cement Concrete Cylinder. The concrete with 20% glass waste content had the highest density, which was 2380.4 kg/m3 that defines good quality concrete.
Suggested Citation
Fahmida Munim Ani & Md. Altaf Hossain & Raha Nadoal Shahril, 2022.
"Recycling of Glass Waste on the Concrete Properties as a Partial Binding Material Substitute,"
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 7(6), pages 138-142, October.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:7:y:2022:i:6:id:62940
DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2022.7.6.2940
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:7:y:2022:i:6:id:62940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.