IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v6y2021i2id62369.html

Comparative Analysis of Microwave and Electric Arc as a New Method in Weed Control

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Sahin

    (Harran University, Turkey)

Abstract

The increase in the demand for organic production and the adverse effects of chemicals used in agriculture have brought non-chemical weed control methods to the fore. Among these methods, the most studied ones are microwave and electric arc methods. It has been determined in studies that microwaves and electric current, when applied at the correct power level and for sufficient time, biologically inactivate weeds, all kinds of unwanted plants and seeds. In this study, the mortality rates caused by microwave energy and electric current (arc) methods in some plants applied under laboratory conditions were compared. Studies have shown that the effectiveness of microwave and electric arc methods depends on the selected current, voltage, power level and exposure time. It is thought that the electric arc method is easier and more economical in terms of application in the field than the microwave method. Another purpose of this study is to remind agricultural policy makers and decision makers of the importance of alternative weed control methods and to ensure that they make policies in this direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Sahin, 2021. "Comparative Analysis of Microwave and Electric Arc as a New Method in Weed Control," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 6(2), pages 132-135, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:6:y:2021:i:2:id:62369
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2021.6.2.2369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/62369
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/62369/12607
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2021.6.2.2369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:6:y:2021:i:2:id:62369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.