Author
Listed:
- Desmond B. Munyadzwe
(Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana)
- Nonduduzo B. Mamba
(Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana)
- Raymond Sogna Suglo
(Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Botswana)
Abstract
Productivity management in materials handling is critical to mining operations. Most open pit mines use modular dispatch systems to control and monitor the movement of their materials handling equipment and operations. Statistical methods can be used on the data collected by the dispatch systems to identify major losses in time, tonnage and finances in productivity management. In this study, three ranking methods (a base case and two modified ranking methods) were used to evaluate the significance of the deviation and correlation parameters in productivity losses. A load and haul productivity loss ranking model was developed using data obtained from Mempeasem Gold Mine’s from January to October 2018 and tested with data obtained in November 2018. The results show that the ranking model can be used in the analysis of production data over any period of time and that the model is applicable in the analysis of the performance of all types of discrete load and haul equipment (trucks and excavators), either operating individually or in combination. The ranking based on deviation values is useful for comparative purposes. However, the ranking based on reduced values is more useful in decision making processes as it enables mine operators to take mitigation measures according to the level of priority of each item. Decision makers could also use the suggested colour coding for easy identification of the priority losses.
Suggested Citation
Desmond B. Munyadzwe & Nonduduzo B. Mamba & Raymond Sogna Suglo, 2020.
"Evaluating Productivity Management of Materials Handling System at Mempeasem Gold Mine,"
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 5(8), pages 948-954, August.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:8:id:61991
DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.8.1991
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:8:id:61991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.