IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v5y2020i2id61745.html

Comparison of a Tannery that Using the Conventional Treatment of Waste Water and That Using the Recycling Method

Author

Listed:
  • Rehab Ahmed Salman
  • G. A. Gasmelseed
  • R. S. Hassan

Abstract

The conventional treatment methods of tannery spent float is found to be not sufficient to meet the required international standers levels of liquid discharges on the other hand the establishment of the treatment unit for the physical, biological and chemical treatment of the spent float is found to be extremely high-cost process. During the life time of the tannery by using the recycling of the spent float method, there would be a great saving in the water and the chemicals as well as environment protection. The comparison of the capital cost estimates of two tanneries with the same capacity, one with the conventional treatment method (large treatment unit should be established) and the other used the recycling of the spent float process, show the advantages of using the recycling process over the conventional treatment process.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehab Ahmed Salman & G. A. Gasmelseed & R. S. Hassan, 2020. "Comparison of a Tannery that Using the Conventional Treatment of Waste Water and That Using the Recycling Method," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 5(2), pages 124-126, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:2:id:61745
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.2.1745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/61745
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/61745/12338
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.2.1745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:2:id:61745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.