IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v5y2020i1id61688.html

Optimal Simulation and Mathematical Correlation of Mud Weight for Effective Wellbore Stability Management

Author

Listed:
  • Boniface A. Oriji

    (Institute of Petroleum Studies, Nigeria)

  • Raphael Odikpo Okeke

    (Institute of Petroleum Studies, Nigeria)

Abstract

Wellbore instability is a problem that affects drilling activities. It is therefore important to provide an optimal solution that prevents or reduces the occurrence of wellbore collapse and not compromise the integrity of the well. In this study, work was done to assess the impact of several parameters including tubing pressure, tubing fluid temperature, length of tubing, gas density, liquid density, tubing hold-up and total mass flow on mass fraction of tubing muds were considered. Data points for this investigation were obtained using OLGA multiphase simulator. The results of the simulation (including the trend and plot data) were exported to MATLAB to develop a mud weight model (correlation) using the MATLAB regress function. The correlation was also validated using statistical techniques such as the R square and Significance F values. Comparison of the trend plots of the actual data points from OLGA and the predicted data points was also done to further prove the reliability of the correlation. The correlation predictions agreed with the OLGA results excellently with a relative error of less than 0.001 %. This study revealed that the tubing mud weight is significantly impacted on by variables like tubing holdup, tubing gas density, tubing liquid densities and the total mass flow. Whereas the tubing pressure, fluid temperature, and the tubing length have insignificant effects on the tubing mud weight. From the trend plots of the variables, it was deduced that as the tubing pressure increased, the temperature and the mud weight also increased. While, the total mass and volumetric flows reduced with increased tubing pressure. The effect of input data uncertainties on the developed correlation were also tested by using 22 observation points to predict tubing mud weight and calculating the resulting residual values. Over 90% of the residual values were negative and the percentage difference in mud weight between the first and the last observation points was approximately 4%. Hence, the effect of input data uncertainties on the developed correlation is insignificant. This report will serve as a template for drilling engineers, assisting them with a simple, fast and reliable technique for determining optimum drilling parameters with a lesser engineering exertion and drilling experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Boniface A. Oriji & Raphael Odikpo Okeke, 2020. "Optimal Simulation and Mathematical Correlation of Mud Weight for Effective Wellbore Stability Management," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 5(1), pages 96-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:1:id:61688
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.1.1688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/61688
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/61688/12323
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2020.5.1.1688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:5:y:2020:i:1:id:61688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.