Author
Listed:
- James Maina Muriithi
(Department of Mechatronic Engineering, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Private bag Nyeri, Kenya)
- Harrison Ngetha
(Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Private Bag, Kenya)
- Jean Byiringiro
(Department of Mechatronic Engineering, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Private bag Nyeri, Kenya)
- Kevin Volkmer
(Institute of Fluid and Thermodynamic, Siegen University, Siegen, Germany)
- Thomas Carolus
(Institute of Fluid and Thermodynamic, Siegen University, Siegen, Germany)
Abstract
Evaluation of the power potential of a particular type of wind turbine at a specific site is necessary for economic decisions. Therefore, the information of a wind turbine and that of a site have to be measured or predicted and then combined with the power curve of a wind turbine. The main objective of this research was to predict the power potential of the existing small wind turbine with a diameter of 3m and the wind turbine site at the University of Siegen and compare with the annual energy calculated from the measured one year of wind and turbine data. Techniques for prediction of the wind speed distribution of a site were determined and modeled. The power curve of the wind turbine was modeled from data recorded by applying a technique from the novel methods for modelling the power curve. In this research, artificial neural network, Weibull and Rayleigh are the techniques modeled to predict wind speed distribution at the wind turbine site. Rayleigh and Weibull were chosen since the two models depict a better wind speed distribution and require the mean and the standard deviation of the wind speed at the wind turbine site. A neural network trained with the backward propagation levernberg-Marquardt algorithm was applied to predict the wind speed and power potential of the wind turbine site. A comparison between Weibull, Rayleigh and the Levernberg-Marquardt trained neural network wind speed was made. The power curve of the wind turbine was successfully evaluated from wind data and wind turbine data recorded. The results indicate that the annual mean wind speed of the region is 2.54 (m/s) and about 20% of the wind availability was blowing from the west. The annual energy yield predicted from the trained neural network was 372 (kWh) closer to that determined from measured wind speed 360 (kWh) than that determined from Weibull and Rayleigh 337 and 233 (kWh) respectively. The three prediction models are applicable in any region to predict the annual energy of a particular wind turbine site with minimal data available.
Suggested Citation
James Maina Muriithi & Harrison Ngetha & Jean Byiringiro & Kevin Volkmer & Thomas Carolus, 2019.
"Wind Data Analysis, Annual Resource Estimation And Comparison With Measured Annual Energy Yield at the University Wind Turbine,"
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 4(6), pages 25-33, June.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:4:y:2019:i:6:id:61355
DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2019.4.6.1355
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:4:y:2019:i:6:id:61355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.