Author
Listed:
- Jide Julius Popoola
(Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria)
- Thompson Emeka Godson
- Yekeen Olajide Olasoji
(Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria)
- Michael Rotimi Adu
(Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria)
Abstract
Over the past decade, different image segmentation algorithms have been developed and employed in segmenting or analyzing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in the clinical applications for the detection of brain tumor. However, accurate detection, compression and transmission of brain tumor data remain parts of the challenging tasks militating against brain tumor telemedicine services due to the complex nature of brain tumor MRI scans. In overcoming this challenge, five different brain tumor segmentation algorithms were developed for this study. The algorithms were developed using MATLAB scripts. The developed algorithms were evaluated using patients’ data retrieved from Mayfield website. The result of the comparative performance compression rate efficiency evaluation test carried out shows that the developed hybrid threshold-watershed segmentation algorithm outperforms others in terms of compression efficiency. The result implies that the usage of the developed hybrid threshold-watershed segmentation algorithm in transmitting brain tumor patients’ data transmission over wireless communication system will require limited bandwidth resource.
Suggested Citation
Jide Julius Popoola & Thompson Emeka Godson & Yekeen Olajide Olasoji & Michael Rotimi Adu, 2019.
"Study on Capabilities of Different Segmentation Algorithms in Detecting and Reducing Brain Tumor Size in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Effective Telemedicine Services,"
European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 4(2), pages 23-29, February.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:4:y:2019:i:2:id:61142
DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2019.4.2.1142
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:4:y:2019:i:2:id:61142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.