IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v3y2018i9id60841.html

A Comparative Analysis of Job Scheduling for Optimum Performance of Parallel Machines by Considering the Energy Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Faccio

    (University of Padova)

  • Mojtaba Nedaei

    (University of Padova)

  • Francesco Pilati

    (University of Bologna)

Abstract

In this study, a comparative analysis of scheduling of machines and jobs was conducted by proposing a method, which aims to optimize the performance of the job-shop environment. A wide range of objective functions including make-span, maximum tardiness, total flow time, total tardiness, total weighted flow time, and total weighted tardiness, and energy consumption. The decision variables of a manufacturing company including the job’s weight, stating and completion time, due dates, releasing date, and processing time were considered as inputs of the optimization model. Then, subject to the defined technical constraints of the system, a comparative analysis on the basis of eight scheduling methods was conducted to assess the performance indicators of the job-shop system. Results of the analysis revealed variations of different objective functions based on the proposed methods. The optimum make-span varied from minimum of 210 days estimated by the Earliest Due Date (EDD) method, up to 222 days estimated by the Critical Ratio (CR) method. Further recommendations were also made for optimum values of the involved decision variables in the considered job-shop environment. Results revealed that the maximum tardiness was best optimized using the EDD method, whilst the Shortest Processing Time (SPT) led to the best optimum value for the total flow time. Analysis of the energy evaluation of the machines showed that the optimum overall energy consumption has been observed with the value of 7,934 kWh for the first operating machine under the effect of the Minimum Slack method, whilst the optimum energy consumption for the second machine was observed with the value of 7,968 kWh using the First Come First Served (FCFS). Last stage of study recommended the optimum planning schedules and resource allocations of the jobs in the machines considering each scheduling method during the operation of the designed job-shop.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Faccio & Mojtaba Nedaei & Francesco Pilati, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of Job Scheduling for Optimum Performance of Parallel Machines by Considering the Energy Consumption," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 3(9), pages 6-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:3:y:2018:i:9:id:60841
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2018.3.9.841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/60841
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/60841/11944
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2018.3.9.841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:3:y:2018:i:9:id:60841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.