IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v2y2017i8id60448.html

A Comparative Study of the Fisher’s Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines

Author

Listed:
  • Jude Chukwura Obi

    (The University of Leeds UK and Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Anambra State, Nigeria.)

Abstract

The relative merits of Fisher’s Discriminant Analysis (FDA) over Support Vector Machines or vice versa, will remain a bone of contention among statisticians and the machine learning community. This line of thought may be owed to the fact that FDA is due to Fishers R. A., a statistician, whereas SVM is a credit to Vanik and his team of the machine learning. In order to give a clearer picture on the strength and weakness of both classifiers, they are compared in terms of the different theories behind each one. We also look into the ways regularization is carried out by each classifier, and further examine how FDA and SVM respond to lineartransformations. We conclude with examination of the behaviour of FDA and SVM on data, given different scenarios, and in high dimensions too. In the end, we clearly draw out the differences and similarities between the two classifiers, and further highlight features that make each classifier ideal for a given classification problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Jude Chukwura Obi, 2017. "A Comparative Study of the Fisher’s Discriminant Analysis and Support Vector Machines," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 2(8), pages 35-40, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:2:y:2017:i:8:id:60448
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2017.2.8.448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/60448
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/60448/11795
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2017.2.8.448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:2:y:2017:i:8:id:60448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.