IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v11y2026i2id63306.html

Comparative Evaluation of Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Models in AI-Based Cyber-Physical Systems Control and Security Architectures

Author

Listed:
  • Mkpang Coco-Bassey

    (University of Cross River State, Nigeria)

  • Eko James Akpama

    (University of Cross River State, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of Support Vector Machines (SVM/SVR) and Random Forest Models (RFM) for AI-based control and security architectures in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS). This study employs a MATLAB-Simulink simulation framework to implement SVM for cyber threat classification (achieving 90% accuracy) and SVR for traffic efficiency prediction (RMSE: 0.2861), alongside Random Forest models for the same tasks. The results demonstrate that while SVM/SVR models achieved reliable performance, Random Forest models outperformed certain security detection tasks because of their improved feature importance evaluation and ensemble learning capabilities. This study analyzes model training, evaluation metrics, feature importance, and computational requirements to guide optimal model selection for real-time CPS deployment. The findings provide practical insights into AI model trade-offs in CPS applications and, support engineers and researchers in designing robust, scalable, and efficient AI-driven control and security systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mkpang Coco-Bassey & Eko James Akpama, 2026. "Comparative Evaluation of Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Models in AI-Based Cyber-Physical Systems Control and Security Architectures," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-6, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:11:y:2026:i:2:id:63306
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2026.11.2.63306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/63306
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/63306/13911
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2026.11.2.63306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:11:y:2026:i:2:id:63306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.