Author
Listed:
- P. I. Obi
(Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria)
- Osita Opua
(Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria)
- C. A. Okeke
(Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria)
- G. C. Diyoke
(Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria)
- I. K. Onwu
(Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria)
Abstract
The desired speed of DC motors in most cases is a function of the intending usage, hence, the speed is continually regulated/controlled to suit different usage. Three basic methods are employed in the speed control; the quantitative comparison of these methods was investigated in this paper. For shunt and series motors delivering 11.07Hp and 13.94Hp respectively (at rated speed), the efficiencies were 84.43% and 90.22% with running cost of ₦246.00 and ₦276.00 respectively. Increasing the shunt motor speed by reducing armature resistance (armature control) reduces the running cost but increases the efficiency from its original values to ₦238.70 and 82.89% respectively at 0.6 of the rated armature resistance; decreasing the speed of the motor by this means decreases efficiency and increases running cost. However, increasing the motor speed by decreasing the armature resistance for series dc motors decreases efficiency and also increases running cost, with 0.6 of rated armature resistance used, the efficiency dropped to 83.15% while running cost went up to ₦299.47. But decreasing the series motor speed increases efficiency and reduces running cost.
Suggested Citation
P. I. Obi & Osita Opua & C. A. Okeke & G. C. Diyoke & I. K. Onwu, 2018.
"Quantitative Comparison of Direct Current Shunt and Series Motors Speed Control Methods,"
European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, European Open Science, vol. 2(5), July.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejece0:v:2:y:2018:i:5:id:19030
DOI: 10.24018/ejece.2018.2.5.30
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejece0:v:2:y:2018:i:5:id:19030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejece .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.