Author
Listed:
- Betsabé DeLaCruz-Corona
(Autonomous University of Baja California, México)
- Alexandra Gómez-Castro
(Autonomous University of Baja California, México)
- Julio César García-Briones
(Autonomous University of Baja California, México)
- Adolfo Neftalí García-Barrón
(Autonomous University of Baja California, México)
- Benjamín González-Vizcarra
(Autonomous University of Baja California, México)
- Fernanda Araiza-Verduzco
(Autonomous University of Baja California, México)
Abstract
This study’s objective was to compare compressive strength of two restorative materials, glass ionomer (EQUIA forte) and alkasite (Cention N), when used over tricalcium silicate (Biodentine) as a pulp capping material. An in vitro study was conducted using 30 extracted premolars without caries, restorations od resorption. Standardized Class I cavities were prepared, lined with 1 mm layer of Biodentine, and restored with the two materials mentioned before. Samples underwent mechanical testing using a universal testing machine. Compressive strength was calculated, and results were analyzed using Student’s t-test. No statistically significant difference was observed between the compressive strength of glass ionomer (mean: 17.56 MPa) and alkasite (mean: 13.88 MPa) restorations(p = 0.3304). Stereomicroscopy revealed adhesive failure in the alkasite group and better dentin adhesion in the glass ionomer group, as well as higher punctual values. Both restorative materials demonstrated comparable compressive strength when used over tri calcium silicate. The findings support their interchangeable use, with selection potentially guided by clinical preference, availability, and cost.
Suggested Citation
Betsabé DeLaCruz-Corona & Alexandra Gómez-Castro & Julio César García-Briones & Adolfo Neftalí García-Barrón & Benjamín González-Vizcarra & Fernanda Araiza-Verduzco, 2025.
"Comparative Analysis of the Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer and Alkasite Restorative Materials over Tricalcium Silicate,"
European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, European Open Science, vol. 6(4), pages 4-7, July.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:6:y:2025:i:4:id:13384
DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2025.6.4.384
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:6:y:2025:i:4:id:13384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.