IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejdent/v4y2023i3id13252.html

Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutment in Different Angulation: An In Vitro Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rajib Kumar Banik

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

  • Mahbubur Rahman

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

  • Aeysha Siddika

    (Sapporo Dental College, Bangladesh)

  • Bithi Majumder

    (Community Based Health Care, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Abid

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

  • Mozammal Hossain

    (Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh)

Abstract

The study was designed to find out the effect of different angulations of monolithic Zirconia custom-made abutments on fracture resistance. In this experimental type in vitro study, a total of thirty implant analogs with a diameter of 4.3 mm and a length of 11.5 mm were obtained for the maxillary central incisor. A total of thirty abutments specimens in three groups- 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree, ten in each group were fabricated with monolithic zirconium by CAD/CAM system. Each abutment was subjected to load until fracture in a Universal testing machine and data was collected to a data collection sheet. One-way ANOVA was done to compare the fracture load among the three groups and pairwise comparison was done by Tukey post hoc test. The statistical significance p-value was considered as less than 0.05. The range of fracture load of 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree angulated abutments were 590.55-1305.43N, 755.89-1720.55N, and 496.68-820.88N respectively. The highest fracture resistance was shown in 15-degree angulated custom-made zirconium abutments with a mean ± SD of 1223.442 ± 317.771N and the lowest fracture resistance was shown in case 25-degree with a mean ± SD deviation of 653.139 ± 102.045N. The mean ± SD of the 0-degree abutment was 948.944±245.588N. 95% Confidence interval of the mean were 773.260-1124.627N, 996.122-1450.761N, and 580.140-726.137N were assessed in cases of 0-degree, 15-degree, and 25-degree respectively. The fracture load or fracture resistance among the three groups of custom-made monolithic zirconium abutments were significantly different. 15-degree angulated abutment had higher fracture resistance properties. straight abutment had more fracture resistance properties than that of 25-degree abutments, but less than 25-degree abutments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajib Kumar Banik & Mahbubur Rahman & Aeysha Siddika & Bithi Majumder & Mohammad Abid & Mozammal Hossain, 2023. "Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutment in Different Angulation: An In Vitro Study," European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, European Open Science, vol. 4(3), pages 18-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:4:y:2023:i:3:id:13252
    DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2023.4.3.252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/view/13252
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent/article/download/13252/2846
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejdent.2023.4.3.252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:4:y:2023:i:3:id:13252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.