Author
Listed:
- S. Tyagi
(I.T.S Dental College, India)
- K. Shetty
(I.T.S Dental College, India)
- G. Issar
(I.T.S Dental College, India)
- S. Rani
(I.T.S Dental College, India)
- S. Kumar
(Teerthankar Dental College, India)
- H. G. Jagadeesh
(I.T.S Dental College, India)
- S. Khan
(I.T.S Dental College, India)
Abstract
Aim: Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare stress transfer at bone implant interface in customized root form implant and conventional endosseous implant. Materials and methodology: A three-dimensional finite element model of Emulate implant and conventional endosseous implant (nobel active 4.2X11.5mm) was generated. The implants were restored with metal ceramic crown and subjected to 20 Mpa of axial applied stress. Resolved stresses were examined at four heights along the implant bone interface. Results: In conventional endosseous implant with 100 % osseointegration higher stresses (1.01-0.12 MPa) were concentrated on the facial surface of crest of implant. The stresses decreased from junction of cortical bone and trabecular bone to the apex of implant (0.36 – 0.12 MPa). The maximum stresses on emulate implant with 100 % osseointegration were at the facial surface of the crest of implant (0.05 MPa) which were comparatively lesser than conventional endosseous implant (1.01 MPa). Conclusion: The degree of osseointegration affected the stress levels or distributions around both implants. Crestal stresses were always higher than apical stress. When the implants were 100% osseointegrated, then stresses were higher on conventional endosseous implant while in case of 50% osseointegration, stresses were higher on emulate implant.
Suggested Citation
S. Tyagi & K. Shetty & G. Issar & S. Rani & S. Kumar & H. G. Jagadeesh & S. Khan, 2020.
"Evaluation of Stress Transfer at Bone Implant Interface in Emulate Implant and Conventional Endosseous Implant: A Comparative 3-D Finite Element Analysis Study,"
European Journal of Dental and Oral Health, European Open Science, vol. 1(5), September.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:1:y:2020:i:5:id:13029
DOI: 10.24018/ejdent.2020.1.5.29
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejdent:v:1:y:2020:i:5:id:13029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejdent .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.