Author
Listed:
- Fildza Aulia Rahmasari
(Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia)
- Ilma Aulia Zaim
(Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia)
Abstract
Cosmetic items are now an essential part of everyone’s everyday life. Moreover, the global cosmetics business is predicted to experience significant growth in the upcoming years due to the broad integration of cosmetic products into the everyday routines of modern individuals. Indonesia’s market is in a similar state with regard to the cosmetics business. Given the enormous potential for growth in the Indonesian cosmetics sector and the increasing level of competition in the domestic cosmetics market, the local cosmetic brand Mad For Makeup aims to enhance its business in order to meet its goals, stay competitive, and establish a connection with its target market. Because of this, the business must enhance and validate its value proposition to guarantee that the values it offers are in line with what its customers actually want. This study validated the value proposition hypotheses for Mad For Makeup using the 4-point Likert scale survey method. The validation stages are interest validation, preference validation, and willingness to pay validation. The results of the validation steps show that the value proposition hypothesis related to skincare products that maintain healthy skin is the most attractive and the most relevant value proposition to customers.
Suggested Citation
Fildza Aulia Rahmasari & Ilma Aulia Zaim, 2024.
"Value Proposition Testing for Mad For Makeup,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 9(6), pages 34-38, October.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:9:y:2024:i:6:id:52446
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.6.2446
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:9:y:2024:i:6:id:52446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.