Author
Listed:
- Joshua Ofori-Amanfo
(University of Ghana Business School, Ghana)
- Florence Newman
(University of Ghana Business School, Ghana)
- Prosper Konlan
(University of Ghana Business School, Ghana)
- Juliet Siaw
(University of Ghana Business School, Ghana)
Abstract
This study deepens understanding of the operations strategy of SMEs by examining the extent to which the strategic behavior (using Miles and Snow’s typology) of SMEs influences their e-commerce adoption and customer responsiveness. The study employed a cross-sectional survey design with data collected from 320 SMEs using questionnaires. The Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed in the data analysis. The study finds that SMEs are indifferent towards strategic behavioral options relative to Miles and Snow’s typology. Among the four strategic behavior options (Analysers, Prospectors, Defenders, and Reactors), the Analyser and Defender strategies were found to influence e-commerce adoption but not customer responsiveness. The prospector strategy was determined to influence both e-commerce adoption and customer responsiveness, whereas the reactor strategy was found not to impact either e-commerce adoption or customer responsiveness. The data gathered was from three selected service sub-sectors; hence, this affects the generalisability of the study for all service sector firms. This study suggests that service SMEs who intend to prioritize e-commerce and customer responsiveness must gravitate towards certain strategic behaviors more than others. The study contributes to the operations strategy literature on SMEs through the establishment of the strategic behavioral attributes of SMEs and how these behaviors influence their e-commerce adoption and customer responsiveness.
Suggested Citation
Joshua Ofori-Amanfo & Florence Newman & Prosper Konlan & Juliet Siaw, 2024.
"SMEs’ E-Commerce Adoption and Customer Responsiveness: A Test of Miles and Snow’s Typology,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 9(6), pages 145-162, October.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:9:y:2024:i:6:id:52422
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.6.2422
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:9:y:2024:i:6:id:52422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.