Author
Listed:
- Patrizia De Corato
(Lebanese University, Lebanon)
- Rhonda A. Best
(Alexander Bain & Associates Limited, United Kingdom)
Abstract
The lockdown-induced hybrid working model changed the labour landscape significantly. However, as restrictions were relaxed, there was little sign that previous ways of working would fully return. Instead, some forms of the modern trend were here to stay. You see, once new approaches become mainstream the impact is seldom challenged. Take for example an interview, it is a trusted management tool that helps organisations decide whether a potential recruit might be the right fit. Do you interview everyone that joins your business or are there exceptions? Management tools and systems, like interviews, can remain unchallenged for centuries. This paper adds to the body of research into an organisational design that emphasises human capital and the ability to create value through intangible assets. We bring together three perspectives (i) what experts say are best management practices today, (ii) what employers in Lebanon currently do, and (iii) how effective employees feel these tools are. We draw conclusions that can help accounting professionals to take the step and question traditional practices that might be restricting growth. Our investigation into the subject of value creation revealed that while system updates were already underway in some countries, in Lebanon, businesses are behind in capturing value from intangible assets. That’s significant because intangible assets are up to nine (9) times more valuable than a business’s physical assets. Although senior management there know that employees’ skills, know-how, and commitment can directly impact the financial performance of their business, the work people perform continues to be managed in the traditional way, which is a recipe for failure.
Suggested Citation
Patrizia De Corato & Rhonda A. Best, 2023.
"The Post-pandemic World of Work: Are We Using the Right Management Tools to Create Value?,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 8(4), pages 209-215, July.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:8:y:2023:i:4:id:52056
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.4.2056
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:8:y:2023:i:4:id:52056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.