Author
Listed:
- Elbert Bryan R. Vidal
(University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Oman)
- Remedios P. Magnaye
(Lyceum of the Philippines University, Philippines)
Abstract
The advantage to conceptualize value together with the firm’s customers has been documented to be one that differentiates the future of any enterprise. This challenges companies to engage their customers to participate in the value co-creation process. In consonance with the service-dominant logic, human interactions play a critical role in defining and concretizing the future of an enterprise. Strong ties need to be present for value co-creation to work. The concept of social tie strength, which was originally postulated by Granovetter (1973), encapsulates observed behaviors that define the intensity of social ties that exist between the company and its customers. Through Structural Equation Modelling, the researchers examined the dynamics of the relationship that exists between social tie strength and value co-creation. It further analyzes the role of customer involvement as a mediator to these two main concepts. The research tries to understand if customer involvement amplifies the effect of social tie strength in the value co-creation process. As traditional commerce migrates online, the tendency of companies is to automate things which predominantly were human touchpoints. The researchers emphatically believes that there are certain touchpoints that should not be left automated as this will eradicate the company’s opportunities to work with their customers. Even if AI tools such as chatbots are becoming more efficient, the human aspect in any business transaction cannot be undermined. This claim was validated by the research findings that social tie strength relates to value co-creation and this relationship is positively mediated by customer involvement.
Suggested Citation
Elbert Bryan R. Vidal & Remedios P. Magnaye, 2023.
"Dynamics Between Social Tie Strength, Customer Involvement and E-Commerce Value Co-Creation,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 8(3), pages 128-135, April.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:8:y:2023:i:3:id:51975
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.3.1975
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:8:y:2023:i:3:id:51975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.