IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v7y2022i6id51687.html

A Comparison Study between IFRS 9 and IAS 39 in GCC Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Rania Al-Nsour

    (Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan.)

  • Murad Abuaddous

    (Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan.)

Abstract

IFRS 9 was introduced as a replacement for IAS 39, which spurred a wide debate since its implementation. This study aims to show the impact of IFRS 9 on the performance, solvency, credit ratio, capital adequacy ratio, expected credit loss, non-performing credits and write-offs for local banks operating within the Gulf Cooperation Council. To achieve the objectives of this study, data from financial disclosures was collected for 53 GCC banks for the period 2012-2020, which had 477 years of observation. The cross-sectional data was analyzed using the logit model (panel logistic regression model), capable of extracting non-linear relationships. This study found that there was a substantial positive difference in the percentage of the provision for credit losses, write-offs, and credit and non-performing credit ratios after the implementation of the IFRS 9. In contrast, no substantial difference was found in financial performance indicators, solvency, and capital adequacy ratio. The study offered a set of recommendations based on these findings and offered a number of potential future research opportunities to enrich the topic.

Suggested Citation

  • Rania Al-Nsour & Murad Abuaddous, 2022. "A Comparison Study between IFRS 9 and IAS 39 in GCC Countries," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 7(6), pages 7-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:6:id:51687
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/51687
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/51687/7612
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:6:id:51687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.