IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejbmr0/v7y2022i6id51646.html

The Effectiveness of Patient Safety Training in Cikupa Hospitals: Study Quasi Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Haekal Mahargias

    (Esa Unggul University, Indonesia.)

  • Wekadigunawan

    (Esa Unggul University, Indonesia.)

  • Kemala Rita Wahidi

    (Esa Unggul University, Indonesia.)

Abstract

Patient safety is the absence of danger that can threaten the patient during treatment. In RS X Cikupa Tangerang found the highest incidence was KNC 338 (44%), KPC 306 (40%), KTC 104 (13.5%) and KTD 20 (2.5%) incidents. This is due to the lack of training for nurses. To analyze differences in nurse compliance in the application of patient safety goals before and after Patient Safety Goals training. The type of research is quantitative with a quasi-experimental design using the group pretest-posttest design with the Wilcoxon test. The data taken came from primary data collection, with questionnaires and nurse compliance observation sheets. From a population of 102 people with a total sample of 62 people. The results showed that there were differences in nurse compliance in the application of patient safety goals before and after training, p-value

Suggested Citation

  • Haekal Mahargias & Wekadigunawan & Kemala Rita Wahidi, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Patient Safety Training in Cikupa Hospitals: Study Quasi Experiment," European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 7(6), pages 141-146, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:6:id:51646
    DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/view/51646
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr/article/download/51646/7619
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:6:id:51646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.