Author
Listed:
- Prayudo Ramadesta
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
- Made Sukana
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
- Nararya Narottama
(Udayana University, Indonesia)
Abstract
The study was conducted to analyze the role of stakeholders in the development of mangrove ecotourism and emphasized on the role of relevant stakeholders are government, business, community, academia, and media, but not optimal in the media. This study uses a qualitative descriptive analysis method, the data obtained from observation, interviews, and literature study. The informants in this study were the Environmental Service of Situbondo Regency, the Village Head of Blekok Tourism Village, local communities, tourism entrepreneurs, and visitors. This study has a concept that is the role of ecotourism, tourism development, Tourism Village, and Pentahelix tourism stakeholders. The results of this study indicate that the development of ecotourism in the Tourism Village of Blekok Tourism Village is developing in a fluctuating manner. The number of visitors increased until 2019 and decreased in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, tourism attractions in Blekok Village are very diverse, from shell crafts which are supported by easy accessibility to mangroves, tourism facilities that attract visitors, and tourism institutions in Blekok Village taking part in making tourism development policies. The tourism management of Blekok Tourism Village is successful with collaboration from stakeholders, but there is one role that does not cooperate in the field of mass media, according to the Penta helix concept and there are also tourism problems, especially in the physical environment due to tourism activities. There are changes in physical conditions that occur in the mangrove area including garbage.
Suggested Citation
Prayudo Ramadesta & Made Sukana & Nararya Narottama, 2022.
"The Role of Stakeholders in the Development of Mangrove Eco-Tourism at Blekok Tourism Village, Situbondo, East Java,"
European Journal of Business and Management Research, European Open Science, vol. 7(3), pages 255-260, May.
Handle:
RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:3:id:51448
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1448
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejbmr0:v:7:y:2022:i:3:id:51448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejbmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.